[Regia-NA] Regia Combat (was Greetings)
Douglas Sunlin
list-regia-na@lig.net
Tue, 14 Oct 2003 07:30:16 -0700
There's also legshots, which are not legal in the SCA, but might be pretty
tempting if the opponent was close enough...
On manręden,
Osweald of Baldurstrand
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/California_Viking_Age
http://www.geocities.com/baldurstrand/
>From: VIKING@inthedanelaw.fsnet.co.uk
>Reply-To: list-regia-na@lig.net
>To: list-regia-na@lig.net
>Subject: Re: Re: [Regia-NA] Regia Combat (was Greetings)
>Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 07:21:20 +0200 (CEST)
>
>I was with holding because the two systems are different in most ways, and
>I didn't want to compare apples and oranges. Last time I fought SCA style,
>a few years ago, it was illegal to shieldbash someone, that is to use your
>shield offensively like a weapon. Thus no pushing. So you could get in
>close and perform the miracle back-of-the-head shot. I personally don't
>think it would practical, because...
>1) You have to get in close to execute the manuver, thus making you more
>vulnerable. Why do I want to get inside someone that I know can do the
>same back to me? And if I have an advantage of a distance, I would use it
>at length and not put myself in jeopardy of someone else's shorter range.
>I too think it is an SCA-ism, as if you have ever seen two heavily armored
>fighters, covered by door shields, then you would see the only opening is
>the head...and if they can't push against one-another, then the means close
>in and attack the most exposed target...the head.
>2) I don't think you could get in a killing blow with that attack...wound,
>yes, but not kill.
>Bill
_________________________________________________________________
Send instant messages to anyone on your contact list with MSN Messenger
6.0. Try it now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com