[Regia-NA] # members for land grant

[Hrolf Douglasson]

we started the wirral with 2 couples and my father..and grew we are now
thriving.
you gets out what you puts in
vara
----- Original Message -----
From: <crmayhew@hotmail.com>
To: <list-regia-na@lig.net>
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 4:44 PM
Subject: [Regia-NA] # members for land grant


> 6 sounds like a reasonable number.  Because of our distances, you can't go
> much more than 10, I'd think.
>
> The # of paid members required for an SCA Canton is 5.  My husband and I
> have been threatening for years to seceed from our local Barony and apply
> for Canton status on the basis that our family could be a canton.  We
cover
> some of the requirements such as holding regular activities like sewing
> evenings where everyone gets new garb, have leather-working sessions, have
> fight practice, etc.  The local Baron keeps patiently trying to explain
that
> this is not the *intention* of the SCA rules...
>
> As I'm sure that Regia NA's rule are not intended in the same way.  :)
>
> --charlotte mayhew
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> Wrom: LEJGDGVCJVTLBXFGGMEPYOQKE
> To: <list-regia-na@lig.net>
> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 11:19 AM
> Subject: Re: RE: [Regia-NA] RE: Was sprang BILOXI
>
>
> > Hi Bill
> > At our N.A. AGM held at the Pensic Wars last year it was proposed and
> agreed between the assembled folc that the former minimum number of 3
> members required to apply for a grant of land was too small.
> > As an example, a N.A. group folded because 2 of the 3 members were
> apparently husband and wife and when they left this particular group only
> had one solitary sole.
> > It was also felt that in view of the greater distances between N.A
members
> (even within any grant of land) and in order to better facilitate the
> continuity of any group, that the mininum number of members should be
> increased to six paid up members.
> > I imagine that if a good case were made then five members might be
> acceptable but I hasten to add that this is my slant on things and is not
> the 'official' rule.
> > There is no restriction on distance between members within a grant of
> land.
> > This was one of the reasons for the subsequent decision to up the
minimum
> member numbers to six.
> > Martin
> >
> > >
> > > Wrom: DOTWFAOBUZXUWLSZLKBRNVWWCUFPEGAUTFJ
> <william.tate@mildenhall.af.mil>
> > > Date: 2003/06/26 Thu AM 02:52:00 EST
> > > To: list-regia-na@lig.net
> > > Subject: RE: [Regia-NA] RE: Was sprang BILOXI
> > >
> > > If I remember correctly, by the Code of Law, we need 3 paid members to
> form
> > > a group, but I don't think there is a distance restriction.  Is Mr.
> > > Lawspeaker on this group to confirm this?
> > >
> > > Bill
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > Wrom: MVRESKPNKMBIPBARHDMNNSKVFVWRKJVZCMHVI
> > > Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 6:39 PM
> > > To: list-regia-na@lig.net
> > > Subject: RE: [Regia-NA] RE: Was sprang BILOXI
> > >
> > >
> > >    I'm about 6 hrs away, but from reading this list I would
> > > say that there are at least 3 folks closer than I am.  Is 5
> > > enough for that nucleus?  I'm willing to make the drive.
> > >    My octogenarian parents are, even as we speak, staying in
> > > one of those casino hotels in Bay St. Louis, but not to
> > > gamble. Dad is at Stennis Space Center on business (yes, at
> > > 81 he still works! And has fun at it.) and Mom is kicking
> > > back doing needlework, reading and people watching.  She is
> > > vastly amused by the casino crowd, and they are both enjoying
> > > the food. And they didn't drive a land barge down there, they
> > > drove Mom's 4-wheel drive Jeep.
> > > -- Tracie
> > >
> > > >Message: 16
> > > >Wrom: BGDADRZFSQHYUCDDJBLVLMHAALPTCXLYRWT
> > > <william.tate@mildenhall.af.mil>
> > > >To: list-regia-na@lig.net
> > > >Subject: RE: [Regia-NA] RE: Was sprang BILOXI
> > >
> > > >So home many persons are withing a couple of hours of
> > > Biloxi?  Do we have a
> > > >nucleus for a group?
> > > >
> > > >Bill
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > list-regia-na mailing list
> > > list-regia-na@lig.net
> > > http://www.lig.net/mailman/listinfo/list-regia-na
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > list-regia-na mailing list
> > > list-regia-na@lig.net
> > > http://www.lig.net/mailman/listinfo/list-regia-na
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > list-regia-na mailing list
> > list-regia-na@lig.net
> > http://www.lig.net/mailman/listinfo/list-regia-na
> >
> _______________________________________________
> list-regia-na mailing list
> list-regia-na@lig.net
> http://www.lig.net/mailman/listinfo/list-regia-na